20 20

Transactions on
Data Privacy
Foundations and Technologies

http://www.tdp.cat


Articles in Press

Accepted articles here

Latest Issues

Year 2025

Volume 18 Issue 2
Volume 18 Issue 1

Year 2024

Volume 17 Issue 3
Volume 17 Issue 2
Volume 17 Issue 1

Year 2023

Volume 16 Issue 3
Volume 16 Issue 2
Volume 16 Issue 1

Year 2022

Volume 15 Issue 3
Volume 15 Issue 2
Volume 15 Issue 1

Year 2021

Volume 14 Issue 3
Volume 14 Issue 2
Volume 14 Issue 1

Year 2020

Volume 13 Issue 3
Volume 13 Issue 2
Volume 13 Issue 1

Year 2019

Volume 12 Issue 3
Volume 12 Issue 2
Volume 12 Issue 1

Year 2018

Volume 11 Issue 3
Volume 11 Issue 2
Volume 11 Issue 1

Year 2017

Volume 10 Issue 3
Volume 10 Issue 2
Volume 10 Issue 1

Year 2016

Volume 9 Issue 3
Volume 9 Issue 2
Volume 9 Issue 1

Year 2015

Volume 8 Issue 3
Volume 8 Issue 2
Volume 8 Issue 1

Year 2014

Volume 7 Issue 3
Volume 7 Issue 2
Volume 7 Issue 1

Year 2013

Volume 6 Issue 3
Volume 6 Issue 2
Volume 6 Issue 1

Year 2012

Volume 5 Issue 3
Volume 5 Issue 2
Volume 5 Issue 1

Year 2011

Volume 4 Issue 3
Volume 4 Issue 2
Volume 4 Issue 1

Year 2010

Volume 3 Issue 3
Volume 3 Issue 2
Volume 3 Issue 1

Year 2009

Volume 2 Issue 3
Volume 2 Issue 2
Volume 2 Issue 1

Year 2008

Volume 1 Issue 3
Volume 1 Issue 2
Volume 1 Issue 1


Volume 5 Issue 3


P3ERS: Privacy-Preserving PEer Review System

Esma Aïmeur(a),(*), Gilles Brassard(a), Sébastien Gambs(b), David Schönfeld(a)

Transactions on Data Privacy 5:3 (2012) 553 - 578

Abstract, PDF

(a) Université de Montréal, Département IRO, C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal (QC), H3C3J7 Canada.

(b) Université de Rennes 1 - INRIA, IRISA, Campus de Beaulieu, Avenue du Général Leclerc, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France.

e-mail:aimeur @iro.umontreal.ca; brassard @iro.umontreal.ca; sebastien.gambs @irisa.fr; schonfeld.david @gmail.com


Abstract

Even though they integrate some blind submission functionalities, current conference review systems, such as EasyChair and EDAS, do not fully protect the privacy of authors and reviewers, in particular from the eyes of the program chair. As a consequence, their use may cause a lack of objectivity in the decision process. In~this paper, we address this issue by proposing P3ERS (for Privacy-Preserving PEer Review System), a distributed conference review system based on group signatures, which aims at preserving the privacy of all participants involved in the peer review process. For~this purpose, we have improved on a generic group signature scheme with revocation features and implemented it in order to ensure the anonymity of the submission and the reviewing phases. We argue that P3ERS could contribute to increase objectivity during the conference review process while maintaining privacy of the various participants.

* Corresponding author.


ISSN: 1888-5063; ISSN (Digital): 2013-1631; D.L.:B-11873-2008; Web Site: http://www.tdp.cat/
Contact: Transactions on Data Privacy; Vicenç Torra; Umeå University; 90187 Umeå (Sweden); e-mail:tdp@tdp.cat
Note: TDP's web site does not use cookies. TDP does not keep information neither on IP addresses nor browsers. For the privacy policy access here.

 


Vicenç Torra, Last modified: 10 : 40 June 27 2015.