20 20

Transactions on
Data Privacy
Foundations and Technologies

http://www.tdp.cat


Articles in Press

Accepted articles here

Latest Issues

Year 2025

Volume 18 Issue 2
Volume 18 Issue 1

Year 2024

Volume 17 Issue 3
Volume 17 Issue 2
Volume 17 Issue 1

Year 2023

Volume 16 Issue 3
Volume 16 Issue 2
Volume 16 Issue 1

Year 2022

Volume 15 Issue 3
Volume 15 Issue 2
Volume 15 Issue 1

Year 2021

Volume 14 Issue 3
Volume 14 Issue 2
Volume 14 Issue 1

Year 2020

Volume 13 Issue 3
Volume 13 Issue 2
Volume 13 Issue 1

Year 2019

Volume 12 Issue 3
Volume 12 Issue 2
Volume 12 Issue 1

Year 2018

Volume 11 Issue 3
Volume 11 Issue 2
Volume 11 Issue 1

Year 2017

Volume 10 Issue 3
Volume 10 Issue 2
Volume 10 Issue 1

Year 2016

Volume 9 Issue 3
Volume 9 Issue 2
Volume 9 Issue 1

Year 2015

Volume 8 Issue 3
Volume 8 Issue 2
Volume 8 Issue 1

Year 2014

Volume 7 Issue 3
Volume 7 Issue 2
Volume 7 Issue 1

Year 2013

Volume 6 Issue 3
Volume 6 Issue 2
Volume 6 Issue 1

Year 2012

Volume 5 Issue 3
Volume 5 Issue 2
Volume 5 Issue 1

Year 2011

Volume 4 Issue 3
Volume 4 Issue 2
Volume 4 Issue 1

Year 2010

Volume 3 Issue 3
Volume 3 Issue 2
Volume 3 Issue 1

Year 2009

Volume 2 Issue 3
Volume 2 Issue 2
Volume 2 Issue 1

Year 2008

Volume 1 Issue 3
Volume 1 Issue 2
Volume 1 Issue 1


Volume 7 Issue 2


SafeBox: adaptable spatio-temporal generalization for location privacy protection

Sergio Mascetti(a),(*), Letizia Bertolaja(a), Claudio Bettini(a)

Transactions on Data Privacy 7:2 (2014) 131 - 163

Abstract, PDF

(a) Universita degli Studi di Milano, Computer Science Dep., EveryWare Lab.

e-mail:fsergio.mascetti; letizia.bertolaja; claudio.bettinig @unimi.it


Abstract

Spatial and temporal generalization emerged in the literature as a common approach to preserve location privacy. However, existing solutions have two main shortcomings. First, spatiotemporal generalization can be used with different objectives: for example, to guarantee anonymity or to decrease the sensitivity of the location information. Hence, the strategy used to compute the generalization can follow different semantics often depending on the privacy threat, while most of the existing solutions are specifically designed for a single semantics. Second, existing techniques prevent the so-called inversion attack by adopting a top-down strategy that needs to acquire a large amount of information. This may not be feasible when this information is dynamic (e.g., position or properties of objects) and needs to be acquired from external services (e.g., Google Maps).

In this contribution we present a formal model of the problem that is compatible with most of the semantics proposed so far in the literature, and that supports new semantics as well. Our BottomUp algorithm for spatio-temporal generalization is compatible with the use of online services, it supports generalizations based on arbitrary semantics, and it is safe with respect to the inversion attack. By considering two datasets and two examples of semantics, we experimentally compare BottomUp with a more classical top-down algorithm, showing that BottomUp is efficient and guarantees better performance in terms of the average size (space and time) of the generalized regions.

* Corresponding author.


ISSN: 1888-5063; ISSN (Digital): 2013-1631; D.L.:B-11873-2008; Web Site: http://www.tdp.cat/
Contact: Transactions on Data Privacy; Vicenç Torra; Umeå University; 90187 Umeå (Sweden); e-mail:tdp@tdp.cat
Note: TDP's web site does not use cookies. TDP does not keep information neither on IP addresses nor browsers. For the privacy policy access here.

 


Vicenç Torra, Last modified: 10 : 34 June 27 2015.