20 20

Transactions on
Data Privacy
Foundations and Technologies

http://www.tdp.cat


Articles in Press

Accepted articles here

Latest Issues

Year 2024

Volume 17 Issue 3
Volume 17 Issue 2
Volume 17 Issue 1

Year 2023

Volume 16 Issue 3
Volume 16 Issue 2
Volume 16 Issue 1

Year 2022

Volume 15 Issue 3
Volume 15 Issue 2
Volume 15 Issue 1

Year 2021

Volume 14 Issue 3
Volume 14 Issue 2
Volume 14 Issue 1

Year 2020

Volume 13 Issue 3
Volume 13 Issue 2
Volume 13 Issue 1

Year 2019

Volume 12 Issue 3
Volume 12 Issue 2
Volume 12 Issue 1

Year 2018

Volume 11 Issue 3
Volume 11 Issue 2
Volume 11 Issue 1

Year 2017

Volume 10 Issue 3
Volume 10 Issue 2
Volume 10 Issue 1

Year 2016

Volume 9 Issue 3
Volume 9 Issue 2
Volume 9 Issue 1

Year 2015

Volume 8 Issue 3
Volume 8 Issue 2
Volume 8 Issue 1

Year 2014

Volume 7 Issue 3
Volume 7 Issue 2
Volume 7 Issue 1

Year 2013

Volume 6 Issue 3
Volume 6 Issue 2
Volume 6 Issue 1

Year 2012

Volume 5 Issue 3
Volume 5 Issue 2
Volume 5 Issue 1

Year 2011

Volume 4 Issue 3
Volume 4 Issue 2
Volume 4 Issue 1

Year 2010

Volume 3 Issue 3
Volume 3 Issue 2
Volume 3 Issue 1

Year 2009

Volume 2 Issue 3
Volume 2 Issue 2
Volume 2 Issue 1

Year 2008

Volume 1 Issue 3
Volume 1 Issue 2
Volume 1 Issue 1


Volume 17 Issue 3


Statistical disclosure control for numeric microdata via sequential joint probability preserving data shuffling

Elias Chaibub Neto(a),(*)

Transactions on Data Privacy 17:3 (2024) 147 - 179

Abstract, PDF

(a) 2901 Third Avenue, Suite 330, Seattle, 98121, USA.

e-mail:elias.chaibub.neto @sagebase.org


Abstract

Traditional perturbative statistical disclosure control (SDC) approaches such as microaggregation, noise addition, rank swapping, etc, perturb the data in an “ad-hoc” way in the sense that while they manage to preserve some particular aspects of the data, they end up modifying others. Synthetic data approaches based on the fully conditional specification data synthesis paradigm, on the other hand, aim to generate new datasets that follow the same joint probability distribution as the original data. These synthetic data approaches, however, rely either on parametric statistical models, or non-parametric machine learning models, which need to fit well the original data in order to generate credible and useful synthetic data. Another important drawback is that they tend to perform better when the variables are synthesized in the correct causal order (i.e., in the same order as the true data generating process), which is often unknown in practice. To circumvent these issues, we propose a fully non-parametric and model free perturbative SDC approach that approximates the joint distribution of the original data via sequential applications of restricted permutations to the numerical microdata (where the restricted permutations are guided by the joint distribution of a discretized version of the data). Empirical comparisons against popular SDC approaches, using both real and simulated datasets, suggest that the proposed approach is competitive in terms of the trade-off between confidentiality and data utility.

* Corresponding author.

Follow us




Supports



ISSN: 1888-5063; ISSN (Digital): 2013-1631; D.L.:B-11873-2008; Web Site: http://www.tdp.cat/
Contact: Transactions on Data Privacy; Vicenç Torra; Umeå University; 90187 Umeå (Sweden); e-mail:tdp@tdp.cat
Note: TDP's web site does not use cookies. TDP does not keep information neither on IP addresses nor browsers. For the privacy policy access here.

 


Vicenç Torra, Last modified: 06 : 46 October 01 2024.